Guesstimating the distance to the moon

Here's a neat trick for estimating the distance to objects.  Stick out your thumb and look at it with just one eye open, then with just the other eye open.  The distance to the object is the distance it appears to jump multiplied by 10.  This works because the distance from your eyes to your thumb on your outstretched arm is about 10 times the distance between your eyes.  

I thought I'd have a go at using this to measure the distance to the moon


That was easy.  The moon jumps 6 moon diameters, which means it's 60 moon diameters away!

Problem: How do we find out the diameter of the moon?  Fortunately, there's another trick we can apply, and I learned this from Kitty Ferguson's book Measuring the Universe.  Here's how it goes: wait for a full lunar eclipse and time how long it takes for the shadow of the Earth to fully eclipse the moon.  Also time from the start of the eclipse to the end of the full eclipse.  The ratio of the two then tells you how much bigger the Earth is than the moon.  (Note that this assumes the moon is relatively nearby compared to the Sun.)

Credit: Kevin Burkett CC-BY-SA 2.0

 
I'm too impatient to wait for a lunar eclipse, so I'm happy to take Kitty's word for it that when you do this you find that the moon has about half the diameter of the Earth. So, we've now got the distance in much more convenient units: the moon is 30 Earth diameters away.  The Earth's diameter is about 13,000 km. You can trust Eratosthenes on this, or if you're like me and you don't trust anyone you can measure it for yourself. So this gives us (approximately) a distance of 390,000 km to the moon.  Wikipedia says it's 384,000 km. But what do they know.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How To Make ASCII Diagrams Beautifuller

Image
I've discovered an excellent tool in asciiflow.com .  The website makes it really easy to create ASCII box diagrams like this They put these things in fruit machines you know! This is ideal for source code banners, which I think should contain helpful documentation - but most programmers think it's a good place for the COPYRIGHT information and nothing else. But wait! we can make it beautifuller... and easier to read... by replacing some of the ASCII characters with ones available in UTF-8: There!  Isn't that better?  (Although some purists may object to non-ASCII characters in your code base.) SOURCE CODE: #!/usr/bin/python2 # coding: utf-8 # + gets converted in different ways depending on it's 4 neighbours # # . N . { nsew(N,S,E,W) has bit 3 set if N in "+|<>" # W + E { nsew(N,S,E,W) has bit 2 set if S in "+|<>" # . S . { nsew(N,S,E,W) has bit 1 set if W in "+-^v" # { nsew(N,S,E,W) has bit 0 set if E ...
Read more

Why growth is falling in all developed countries (as a long term trend)

Image
In this post I argue that economic growth is not the normal state of affairs, it is a blip caused by the discovery of a one-off resource of non-renewable energy.   The logistic equation $$ \frac{dy}{dt} = y(1-y) $$ Here's a simple model.  Humans discover an exploitable but limited resource and start consuming it.  The amount consumed, $y(t)$, is a function of time.  The general form of the equation is $\frac{dy}{dt} = \alpha y (\beta - y)$, but if you choose the right units $\alpha$ and $\beta$ both become $1$. Why should this work, in principle? Early on, the factor $1-y$ is approximately $1$ and can be ignored.  So the model states that annual consumption $dy/dt$ starts off proportional to $y$.  In other words, $y$ grows exponentially at first.  This could happen if exploiting the resource enables further exploitation of the resource.  For example, suppose a few humans are shipwrecked on an island with 1000 trees: they take ages to cut down the ...
Read more

Three ways to look at the Bell/GHZ experiment

Image
In 1964 John Stewart Bell proposed an experiment to determine whether the results of quantum measurements were truly random, or governed by hidden variables, i.e. state that exists prior to the measurement, but which we don’t have access to. The experiment involved creating a large number of EPR pairs, and firing them at two observers, Alice and Bob, who measure their photon’s polarisation, choosing the $\updownarrow$ direction or the $\nearrow\llap\swarrow$ direction at random. Determining the result of the experiment involves doing a complex statistical calculation to see if something called Bell’s inequality is satisfied or violated. The Bell experiment was first performed by in 1982 by Alain Aspect, and the result, as most commonly interpreted, is that hidden variables can only exist if Quantum Mechanics is non-local, i.e. if it supports faster-than-light causality! Some time after Bell proposed his experiment, Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger suggested an alternativ...
Read more