Dork Scratchings

  Original Image: Mariuswalter CC BY-SA 4.0 I've just finished reading "A Crack In Creation" by Jennifer Doudna and Samuel Sternberg.  Doudna is the co-creator of CRISPR, the gene editing tool that genuinely is a Cracking Creation.  (I don't think the pun was intended since the word Cracking is not used much outside of and Wallace and Grommit appreciation societies, however, it would have been incredibly apt if it were!) If you are interested in How-Things-Work then this is a book for you.  I knew next to nothing about cell biology before starting it and now I feel like a pro.  The authors' writing style is incredibly clear, but what really saves you from the sense of drowning in acronym soup are the excellent illustrations throughout the book.  So, if you have heard the terms: DNA, RNA, base pair, ribosome, amino acid, protein, phage, virus, prokaryote, ... and so on, but aren't really sure what these things are or how they relate to each other then

A review of Our Mathematical Universe (Max Tegmark) Our Mathematical Universe was my summer holiday reading this year.  But it turned out to be much more than just something to keep me occupied while lounging on the beach.  This book has changed my conception of reality.  The themes in the book are similar in nature to those in The Fabric of Reality by David Deutch - another one of my favourite books.  However, instead of restricting the argument to the parallel universes predicted by Everett's Universal Wavefunction, Tegmark takes us on a tour of four levels of multiverse.  More than this, he provides an overarching theoretical framework for understanding them based on what he calls "the A-word" (because using its full name is guaranteed to get your paper rejected). The argument goes like this.  Whenever we find Nature appears finely tuned to make self-aware life possible, then there are 3 possible explanations It's a fluke! It's design! (by an intel

It occurred to me the other day while looking at a set of LED traffic lights that they could be improved quite easily.  The layout of the LEDs in all the ones I've seen seems to favour some radial directions over others and/or result in a higher concentration of bulbs at some radii than at others. My solution involves placing LEDs a increasing distances from the centre and as each LED is placed rotating by the golden angle .  This ensures that no radial direction is preferred over any other.  In addition to this, setting $r_n = \sqrt{n}$ ensures that each bulb covers a roughly similar area. By "area covered" I am referring to the portion of space which is closer to that bulb than to any other.  This is the Voronoi cell generated by a point belonging to a set of points.  The picture above shows the Voronoi cells generated by a set of LEDs placed in the manner described, and the code below shows how I obtained it.  I think it would make a pretty stain glass