Phyllotaxis and Fibonacci

Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Theorem of the week

This week's theorem of the week is the fundamental theorem of algebra, and the picture is the proof!


Theorem

Every non degree-zero polynomial $p(z) = a_nz^n + ...+ a_1z +  a_0$ has a root in $\mathbb{C}$.

Picture proof

To see how the picture proves this, write $z$ as $Re^{i\theta}$, then for all $k$
$$
z^k = R^ke^{k i \theta}
$$
So for sufficiently large $R$ the $a_nz^n$ term dwarfs all the others and so the image of $\{z\in\mathbb{C}: \lvert z \rvert = R\}$ must go around the origin $n$ times, like the rubber band in the photo.  But when $R= 0$ the image is just $\{a_0\}$ which goes around the origin zero times.  So, for some $0 < r < R$ the image of $\{z\in\mathbb{C}: \lvert z \rvert = r\}$ must cross the origin.  QED.

Less handwavy proof

In order to obtain a contradiction assume $p(z)$ has no zeros.  Then $\frac{z^{n-1}}{p(z)}$ is everywhere differentiable, which in turn means that its closed loop integrals are zero$^{(\dagger)}$.  So, letting $\gamma_R$ be the circle $\lvert z \rvert = R$ we have
$$
\begin{align}
0 &= \int_{\gamma_R}\frac{z^{n-1}}{p(z)}dz\\
&= \int_{0}^{2\pi}\frac{R^{n-1}e^{i(n-1)\theta}}{\sum_{k=0}^na_kR^ke^{ik\theta}}Rie^{i\theta}d\theta\\
&= i\int_{0}^{2\pi}\frac{R^ne^{in\theta}}{\sum_{k=0}^na_kR^ke^{ik\theta}}d\theta\\
&= i\int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{d \theta}{\sum_{k=0}^na_kR^{k-n}e^{i(k-n)\theta}}  \\
&\underset{R \to \infty}{\longrightarrow} \frac{2\pi i}{a_n} \\
\end{align}
$$
which was the contradiction we were seeking.

Footnotes

$(\dagger)$ Let's assume $f(z)$ is differentiable in some open set containing $\Omega$ and see if we can show that the closed loop integral around $\Omega$ is zero.  It's sufficient to show the real part is zero since $if(z)$ is also  differentiable.  The following uses Gauss' divergence theorem, and the definition $f(x+iy) = u(x,y)+iv(x,y)$:

$$
\begin{align}
Re\left(\int_{\partial\Omega} f(z) dz\right)   &= \int_{\partial\Omega} udx - vdy \\
 &=\int_{\partial\Omega} (v,u) \cdot (-dy,dx) \\
 &=\int_{\partial\Omega} (v,u) \cdot \hat{\textbf{n}} dl \\
 &=\int_\Omega v_x + u_y dA \\
 &= \int_\Omega Im\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\right) + Im\left(i\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right) dA \\
 &= \int_\Omega Im\left(\frac{df}{dz}\right) + Im\left(-\frac{df}{dz}\right) dA \\
 &= 0
\end{align}
$$

Comments